Discussion about this post

User's avatar
grebnitz's avatar

Unfortunately, an 89-year-old with a hip fracture has an outlook in the coming months which is mediocre at best, even under good circumstances. I don't see any actual evidence of negligence on behalf of the surgeon. Even if we take for granted that the surgeon caused the bleed, it's not clear that it is negligent.

Expand full comment
Blake Moore's avatar

Most orthopedic surgeons take call and take care of hip fractures on weekends despite any additional fellowships training they have. Hip fractures are really considered “bread and butter” in that there are so many that occur that we all share the load in taking care of them. Looking at the final fleuro shots the nail looks well positioned. Seems like a nightmare for everyone but I’m not convinced there was any mal practice here. In the same situation I would continue to fix the fracture as well while waiting for vascular. Otherwise you’re just standing there doing nothing or making things worse. This case takes all of 30 minutes when it’s going well.

With regard to the fleuro images not being saved - that’s on the radiology tech. I have them save everything on every case but that’s not standard. Many times the final A/P and lateral are all that get saved.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts